Volume 47 Issue 4
Apr.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LU Tianjian. Why Scientific Research Must Uphold the Four Essential Criteria:Reflections on Significance, Necessity, Originality, and Feasibility[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2026, 47(4): 391-403. doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.470101
Citation: LU Tianjian. Why Scientific Research Must Uphold the Four Essential Criteria:Reflections on Significance, Necessity, Originality, and Feasibility[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2026, 47(4): 391-403. doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.470101

Why Scientific Research Must Uphold the Four Essential Criteria:Reflections on Significance, Necessity, Originality, and Feasibility

doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.470101
  • Received Date: 2026-04-15
  • Rev Recd Date: 2026-04-15
  • Available Online: 2026-04-30
  • Presently, scientific research is becoming increasingly active, interdisciplinary integration is deepening, and artificial intelligence is rapidly entering knowledge production, reconsidering what truly constitutes highquality research has become a matter of immediate practical relevance. This paper argues that scientific research should uphold four essential criteria: significance, necessity, originality, and feasibility. Significance asks whether a study is worth pursuing; necessity asks why it must be undertaken and why now; originality concerns what substantive advance it makes; and feasibility asks whether its outcomes can truly stand and be translated under scientific, technical, engineering, economic, and practical constraints. These four criteria are not isolated labels, but form a logical chain from problem formulation to the establishment of credible results. Several tendencies in current research practice deserve particular caution: replacing judgment on scientific problems with journal labels and impact factors, reversing research logic by chasing international trends and toptier journals, packaging marginal variations as originality, and presenting ideas that lack object constraints, manufacturability, cost awareness, durability assessment, and application compatibility as “frontier breakthroughs.” In the age of artificial intelligence, big data, and automated research, results can be generated faster, appearances of completeness can be produced more easily, and ideas can be packaged more persuasively; reiterating these four criteria is therefore not a conservative reaction against new tools, but a basic safeguard against the deviation of scientific judgment by formal abundance. For Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, reaffirming the four criteria also means clarifying the journal’s orientation: mechanics should remain the point of application, engineering goals the central guide, and applied mathematics a source of essential methodological support.
  • loading
  • [2]Nature Editorial.AI-generated research: why journals need to rethink peer review[J]. Nature,2025,628(8007): 267-268.
    卢天健, 孟晗, 姜永烽. (主编按语)AI赋能结构设计[J]. 应用数学和力学, 2026,47(3): 257-262.

    (LU Tianjian, MENG Han, JIANG Yongfeng. (Chief Editor’s Note)AI enables structural design[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics,2026,47(3): 257-262. (in Chinese))
    [3]San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment [EB/OL]. [2026-04-12]. https://sfdora.org/read/.
    [4]HICKS D, WOUTERS P, WALTMAN L, et al. Bibliometrics: the leiden manifesto for research metrics[J]. Nature,2015,520(7548): 429-431.
    [5]国务院办公厅. 国务院办公厅关于完善科技成果评价机制的指导意见: 国办发〔2021〕26号[EB/OL]. (2021-08-02)[2026-04-15]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2021-08/02/content_5628987.htm.
    [6]钱学森. 论技术科学[J]. 科学通报, 1957(3): 97-104.(QIAN Xuesen. On technological science[J]. Cinese Science Bulletin,1957(3): 97-104. (in Chinese))
    [7]钱学森, 谈庆明. 工程和工程科学[J]. 力学进展, 2009,39(6): 643-649.(QIAN Xuesen,TAN Qingming. Engineering and engineering sciences[J]. Advances in Mechanics,2009,39(6): 643-649. (in Chinese))
    [8]胡海岩, 乔栋, 李翔宇, 等. 力学工程问题[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2024.(HU Haiyan, QIAO Dong, LI Xiangyu, et al. Engineering Issues in Mechanics[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2024. (in Chinese))
    [9]杨卫. 力学基本问题[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2024.(YANG Wei. Basic Issues in Mechanics[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2024. (in Chinese))
    [10]KNCHELMANN M. Formal authorship in the wake of uncertain futures: the narrative of publish or perish in the humanities[J]. Research Evaluation,2024,33: rvae044.
    [11]MOOSA I A. Publish or Perish: Perceived Benefits Versus Unintended Consequences[M]. 2nd ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018.
    [12]钱伟长. 发刊词[J]. 应用数学和力学, 1980,1(1): 5-6.(CHIEN Weizang. Preface to the first issue[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics,1980,1(1): 5-6.(in Chinese))
    [13]刘志远, 刘俊丽. 钱伟长的科技期刊办刊理念与实践[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2022,33(12): 1640-1645.(LIU Zhiyuan, LIU Junli. Qian Weichang’s philosophy and practice in running scientific journals[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals,2022,33(12): 1640-1645. (in Chinese))
    [14]卢天健. (主编按语)桥仍在,河向前[J]. 应用数学和力学, 2026,47(1): ⅰ-ⅳ.(LU Tianjian. (Chief Editor’s Note)The bridge is still there, and the river goes forward[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics,2026,47(1): ⅰ-ⅳ.(in Chinese))
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (21) PDF downloads(4) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return