PAN Yue, ZHAO Zhi-gang. Analysis of Main Shock of Thrust Fault Earthquake by Catastrophe Theory[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2012, 33(7): 796-811. doi: 10.3879/j.issn.1000-0887.2012.07.002
Citation: PAN Yue, ZHAO Zhi-gang. Analysis of Main Shock of Thrust Fault Earthquake by Catastrophe Theory[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2012, 33(7): 796-811. doi: 10.3879/j.issn.1000-0887.2012.07.002

Analysis of Main Shock of Thrust Fault Earthquake by Catastrophe Theory

doi: 10.3879/j.issn.1000-0887.2012.07.002
  • Received Date: 2011-07-07
  • Rev Recd Date: 2012-03-29
  • Publish Date: 2012-07-15
  • The relationship between work and energy increment of thrust fault system with quasistatic deformation can be decomposed into two parts, i.e. the relationship between work and energy increment of volume strain energy and that of deviation stress energy,which was analyzed by using method of catastrophe theory. The research indicates that the characteristics displayed by fold catastrophe model can appropriately describe the earthquake generation condition, the evolvement process of main shock of thrust fault earthquake and some important earthquake effects as well. The bigger the surrounding press of surrounding rock is, the bigger the maximum principal stress is. The smaller the incidences of the potential thrust fault surface are, the smaller the rate between the tangential stiffness of surrounding rock and the slope is, which is at inflexion point on the softened zone of fault shearing strength curve. Thus when earthquake occurrs, the larger the elastic energy releasing amount of surrounding rock is, i.e. the larger the intensity of earthquake is. The larger the half distance of fault dislocation is.The larger the displacement amplitude of surrounding rock end face is. Fracturing, expanding of the fault rock body and releasing of volume strain energy of surrounding rock while earthquake occurrs enhance the foregoing earthquake effects together.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Jeger J C, Cook G W. Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics[M]. London: Chapman and Hall Press, 1979: 466-470.
    [2]
    Rice J R. New perspectives in crack and fault dynamics[C]Aref H, Phillips J W. Mechanics for a New Millennium (Proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 27 Aug—2 Sept 2000). Chicago: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001: 1-23.
    [3]
    殷有泉, 郑顾团.断层地震的尖角型突变模型[J]. 地球物理学报, 1988, 31(6): 657-664.(YIN You-quan, ZHENG Gu-tuan. A cusp type catastrophic model of fault earthquake[J]. Acta Geophysica Sinica, 1988, 31(6): 657-664. (in Chinese))
    [4]
    杨修信, 殷有泉, 康仲远, 刘光勋, 王廷韫, 陈沅俊, 张彦山. 压扭性断层地震的Cusp型突变分析[J]. 中国科学(B辑), 1994, 24(6): 656-663.(YONG Xiu-xin, YIN You-quan, KANG Zhong-yuan, LIU Guang-xun, WANG Ting-yun, CHEN Yuan-jun, ZHANG Yan-shan. The cusp type catastrophe analyses of compresso-shear fault earthquake[J]. Science in China (Series B), 1994, 24(6): 656-663. (in Chinese))
    [5]
    潘岳, 李爱武. 走滑式断层地震的折迭突变模型[J]. 应用数学和力学, 2010, 31(3): 324-336.(PAN Yue, LI Ai-wu. Fold catastrophe model of strike-slip fault earthquake[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics(English Edition), 2010, 31(3): 324-336. (in Chinese))
    [6]
    Lassonde M.On the use of KKM multifunctions in fixedpoint theory and related topics[J].J Math Anal Appl,1983,97:151-201.
    [7]
    Massimo C, Concetta N, Ekstrm G. Static stress changes and fault interaction during the 1997 Umbria-Marche earthquake sequence[J]. J Seismology, 2000, 4(4): 501-506.
    [8]
    Ben-zion Y. Dynamic rupture in recent models of earthquake faults[J]. J Mech Phys Solids, 2001, 49(9): 2209-2244.
    [9]
    LIN Jian, Stein R S. Stress triggering in thrust and subduction earthquakes and stress interaction between the southern San Andreas and nearby thrust and strike-slip faults[J]. J Geophys Res, 2004, 109(B02303):1-19.
    [10]
    Jaime O H, Diane I D, Russell R, Stress changes induced by earthquakes and secular stress accumulation in the Buller Region, south island, New Zealand (1929-2002)[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2005, 162(2): 291-310.
    [11]
    卡恰诺夫 L M. 塑性理论基础[M]. 周承侗 译. 北京:人民教育出版社, 1982: 147-148.(Kachanov L M. Fundamentals of Plastic Theory[M]. Translated by ZHOU Sheng-tong. Beijing: People’s Education Press, 1982: 147-148. (in Chinese)).
    [12]
    Karcinovic D. Statistical aspects of the continuous damage theory[J].Int J Solids Structures, 1982, 18(3): 551-562.
    [13]
    凌复华.突变理论──历史、现状和展望[J].力学进展,1984, 14(4): 289-403.(LING Fu-hua. History, present and advances of the catastrophe theory[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 1984, 14(4): 289-403. (in Chinese))
    [14]
    Cook N G W. The failure of rock[J].Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 1965, 2(3):389-403.
    [15]
    陈顒. 地壳岩石的力学性能[M]. 北京:地震出版社, 1988.(CHEN Yong. Mechanical Properties of Crustal Rock[M]. Beijing: Earthquake Press, 1988. (in Chinese))
    [16]
    Stuart W D. Quasi-static earthquake mechanics[J]. Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, 1979, 17(6): 1115-1120.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1509) PDF downloads(846) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return