• Scopus收录
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中文核心期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

交联蛋白断裂特性对肌动蛋白-微管复合网络力学响应的影响

龚博 刘远嘉 袁丽人 许蔚

龚博, 刘远嘉, 袁丽人, 许蔚. 交联蛋白断裂特性对肌动蛋白-微管复合网络力学响应的影响[J]. 应用数学和力学, 2026, 47(6): 736-749. doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.470001
引用本文: 龚博, 刘远嘉, 袁丽人, 许蔚. 交联蛋白断裂特性对肌动蛋白-微管复合网络力学响应的影响[J]. 应用数学和力学, 2026, 47(6): 736-749. doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.470001
GONG Bo, LIU Yuanjia, YUAN Liren, XU Wei. Effects of Fracture Characteristics of Cross-Linking Proteins on the Mechanical Responses of Actin-Microtubule Composite Networks[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2026, 47(6): 736-749. doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.470001
Citation: GONG Bo, LIU Yuanjia, YUAN Liren, XU Wei. Effects of Fracture Characteristics of Cross-Linking Proteins on the Mechanical Responses of Actin-Microtubule Composite Networks[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2026, 47(6): 736-749. doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.470001

交联蛋白断裂特性对肌动蛋白-微管复合网络力学响应的影响

doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.470001
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金(12202169);云南省基础研究计划(202301AT070353)

详细信息
    作者简介:

    龚博(1987—),男,讲师,博士,硕士生导师(通信作者. E-mail: gongbo@kust.edu.cn);许蔚(1976—),男,教授,博士,博士生导师(E-mail: 13354909706@163.com).

    通讯作者:

    龚博(1987—),男,讲师,博士,硕士生导师(通信作者. E-mail: gongbo@kust.edu.cn)

  • 中图分类号: O369

Effects of Fracture Characteristics of Cross-Linking Proteins on the Mechanical Responses of Actin-Microtubule Composite Networks

Funds: 

The National Science Foundation of China(12202169)

  • 摘要: 细胞骨架的力学性能对维持细胞形态、实现细胞运动与分裂等生命过程至关重要.肌动蛋白丝与微管作为细胞骨架的核心组分,通过交联蛋白相互连接,形成复杂的聚合物网络结构,其宏观力学行为与交联蛋白的物理特性密切相关.本研究基于粗粒化肌动蛋白-微管复合网络模型,系统探究了交联蛋白的断裂距离阈值与生成距离阈值两个关键参数对网络力学性能的影响.模拟结果表明:微管交联蛋白的断裂距离阈值对网络的力学响应起着主导作用;减小其断裂距离阈值会导致应力-应变曲线整体向下移动,结构承载能力降低.相比之下,肌动蛋白丝交联蛋白断裂距离阈值的变化对复合网络宏观力学响应影响微弱.此外,交联蛋白的生成距离阈值对网络力学性能影响不显著.本研究揭示了肌动蛋白-微管复合网络的宏观力学性能主要由交联蛋白断裂距离阈值决定,而对生成距离阈值不敏感,为理解动态交联对细胞骨架的力学稳定性提供了新的理解视角.
  • DOGTEROM M, KOENDERINK G H. Actin-microtubule crosstalk in cell biology[J].Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology,2019,20(1): 38-54
    [2]WEN Q, JANMEY P A. Polymer physics of the cytoskeleton[J].Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science,2011,15(5): 177-182.
    [3]HUBER F, BOIRE A, LPEZ M P, et al. Cytoskeletal crosstalk: when three different personalities team up[J].Current Opinion in Cell Biology,2015,32: 39-47.
    [4]LEE W. The cytoskeleton and its binding proteins as mechanosensors, transducers, and functional regulators of cells[J].International Journal of Molecular Sciences,2023,25(1): 172.
    [5]HANG J T, XU G K. Stiffening and softening in the power-law rheological behaviors of cells[J].Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids,2022,167: 104989.
    [6]WANG H, HANG J T, CHANG Z, et al. Static and dynamic mechanics of cell monolayers: a multi-scale structural model[J].Acta Mechanica Sinica,2022,38(5): 222006.
    [7]HANG J T, KANG Y, XU G K, et al. A hierarchical cellular structural model to unravel the universal power-law rheological behavior of living cells[J].Nature Communications,2021,12: 6067.
    [8]MCGARRY J G, PRENDERGAST P J. A three-dimensional finite element model of an adherent eukaryotic cell[J].European Cells and Materials,2004,7: 27-34.
    [9]WANG L, WANG L, XU L, et al. Finite element modelling of single cell based on atomic force microscope indentation method[J].Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine,2019,2019(1): 7895061.
    [10]ZHANG L Y, LI Y, CAO Y P, et al. Stiffness matrix based form-finding method of tensegrity structures[J].Engineering Structures,2014,58: 36-48.
    [11]LIN Y C, KOENDERINK G H, MACKINTOSH F C, et al. Control of non-linear elasticity in F-actin networks with microtubules[J].Soft Matter,2011,7(3): 902-906.
    [12]LIANG D, HANG J T, XU G K. A structure-based cellular model reveals power-law rheology and stiffening of living cells under shear stress[J].Acta Mechanica Sinica,2023,39(10): 623129.
    [13]KIM T, HWANG W, KAMM R D. Dynamic role of cross-linking proteins in actin rheology[J].Biophysical Journal,2011,101(7): 1597-1603.
    [14]KOLE T P, TSENG Y, JIANG I, et al. Intracellular mechanics of migrating fibroblasts[J].Molecular Biology of the Cell,2005,16(1): 328-338.
    [15]FISCHER-FRIEDRICH E, TOYODA Y, CATTIN C J, et al. Rheology of the active cell cortex in mitosis[J].Biophysical Journal,2016,111(3): 589-600.
    [16]CHAUBET L, CHAUDHARY A R, HERIS H K, et al. Dynamic actin cross-linking governs the cytoplasm’s transition to fluid-like behavior[J].Molecular Biology of the Cell,2020,31(16): 1744-1752.
    [17]KUCERA O, GAILLARD J, GUERIN C, et al. Actin-microtubule dynamic composite forms responsive active matter with memory[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2022,119(31): e2209522119.
    [18]HANG J T, WANG H, WANG B C, et al. Anisotropic power-law viscoelasticity of living cells is dominated by cytoskeletal network structure[J].Acta Biomaterialia,2024,180: 197-205.
    [19]LI S H, XU G K. Topological mechanism in the nonlinear power-law relaxation of cell cortex[J].Physical Review E,2023,108(6): 064408.
    [20]ZHOU W H, YIN X, XIE S J, et al. A tensegrity-based mechanochemical model for capturing cell oscillation and reorientation[J].Journal of Applied Physics,2024,136(7): 074701.
    [21]RICKETTS S N, FRANCIS M L, FARHADI L, et al.Varying crosslinking motifs drive the mesoscale mechanics of actin-microtubule composites[J].Scientific Reports,2019,9: 12831.
    [22]RICKETTS S N, ROSS J L, ROBERTSON-ANDERSON R M. Co-entangled actin-microtubule composites exhibit tunable stiffness and power-law stress relaxation[J].Biophysical Journal,2018,115(6): 1055-1067.
    [23]FRANCIS M L, RICKETTS S N, FARHADIL, et al. Non-monotonic dependence of stiffness on actin crosslinking in cytoskeleton composites[J].Soft Matter,2019,15(44): 9056-9065.
    [24]DWYER M E, ROBERTSON-ANDERSON R M, GURMESSA B J. Nonlinear microscale mechanics of actin networks governed by coupling of filament crosslinking and stabilization[J].Polymers,2022,14(22): 4980.
    [25]MAXIAN O, PELEZ R P, MOGILNER A, et al. Simulations of dynamically cross-linked actin networks: morphology, rheology, and hydrodynamic interactions[J].PLoS Computational Biology,2021,17(12): e1009240.
    [26]ZHANG B, GONG Z, ZHAO L, et al. Decoding protein dynamics in cells using chemicalcross-linking and hierarchical analysis[J].Angewandte Chemie International Edition,2023,62(35): e202301345.
    [27]LI L, HOU Z. Crosslink-induced conformation change of intrinsically disordered proteins have a nontrivial effect on phase separation dynamics and thermodynamics[J].The Journal of Physical Chemistry B,2023,127(22): 5018-5026.
    [28]XU J, WIRTZ D, POLLARD T D. Dynamic cross-linking by α-actinin determines the mechanical properties of actin filament networks[J].Journal of Biological Chemistry,1998,273(16): 9570-9576.
    [29]FREEDMAN S L, BANERJEE S, HOCKY G M, et al. A versatile framework for simulating the dynamic mechanical structure of cytoskeletal networks[J].Biophysical Journal,2017,113(2): 448-460.
    [30]ZHA J, ZHANG Y, XIA K, et al. Coarse-grained simulation of mechanical properties of single microtubules with micrometer length[J].Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences,2021,7: 632122.
    [31]CHU J W, VOTH G A. Coarse-grained modeling of the actin filament derived from atomistic-scale simulations[J].Biophysical Journal,2006,90(5): 1572-1582.
    [32]WANG Z, YUAN L, XU W, et al. Mechanical behaviors of actin-microtubule composite network: a coarse-grained Langevin dynamics study[J].Acta Mechanica Sinica,2025,42(4): 624674.
    [33]STUKOWSKI A. Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO: the open visualization tool[J].Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering,2010,18(1): 015012.
    [34]BRANGWYNNE C P, MACKINTOSH F C, KUMAR S, et al. Microtubules can bear enhanced compressive loads in living cells because of lateral reinforcement[J].The Journal of Cell Biology,2006,173(5): 733-741.
    [35]GARDEL M L, NAKAMURA F, HARTWIG J, et al. Stress-dependent elasticity of composite actin networks as a model for cell behavior[J].Physical Review Letters,2006,96(8): 088102.
    [36]POLLARD T D. Actin and actin-binding proteins[J].Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology,2016,8(8): a018226.
    [37]LIELEG O, SCHMOLLER K M, CLAESSENS M M A E, et al. Cytoskeletal polymer networks: viscoelastic properties are determined by the microscopic interaction potential of cross-links[J].Biophysical Journal,2009,96(11): 4725-4732.
    [38]SEMMRICH C, LARSEN R J, BAUSCH A R. Nonlinear mechanics of entangled F-actin solutions[J].Soft Matter,2008,4(8): 1675-1680.
    [39]TANG B, SUN F, WEI X, et al. Defect size and cross-linkerproperties controlled fracture of biopolymer networks[J].Extreme Mechanics Letters,2022,54: 101743.
    [40]WEI X, FANG C, GONG B, et al. Viscoelasticity of 3D actin networks dictated by the mechanochemical characteristics of cross-linkers[J].Soft Matter,2021,17(45): 10177-10185.
    [41]HUISMAN E M, VAN DILLEN T, ONCK P R, et al. Three-dimensional cross-linked F-actin networks: relation between network architecture and mechanical behavior[J].Physical Review Letters,2007,99(20): 208103.
    [42]WEI X, FANG C, GONG B, et al. Time-dependent response of bio-polymer networks regulated by catch and slip bond-like kinetics of cross-linkers[J].Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids,2021,147: 104267.
    [43]LI S H, GAO H, XU G K. Network dynamics of the nonlinear power-law relaxation of cell cortex[J].Biophysical Journal,2022,121(21): 4091-4098.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  11
  • HTML全文浏览量:  3
  • PDF下载量:  2
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-12-31
  • 修回日期:  2026-02-03
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-07-03
  • 刊出日期:  2026-06-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回